Leap of Faye

A Journey

  • Me
    • About Me
    • Advertise
    • Hire Me
    • Disclaimer
  • Parenting
    • Childcare
    • Pregnancy
  • Money Matters
    • Earning
    • Saving
  • Reflections
    • Life
    • Work
  • Favorites
    • Books
    • Products
    • Recipes
  • Fun
  • Blogging
  • Contact

Where is My Mom Tribe?

by

I’m excited to be featured on Parent.co today! Check out the piece for my thoughts on “mom friends” below, or directly on Parent.co.

Where is My Mom Tribe?

It takes a village.

What a cliché, I used to think. Of course – before I had children.

Because back then I didn’t need a village. I had my husband, our dear friends. We had our jobs and our hobbies and our travels and our home. We loved our far-flung village, family outside of the country who we could call and email and visit any time. And they came to see us too. Reminded us that we weren’t alone and could call them for anything. And we did. Well, we would have – if we weren’t already so assured (smug, almost) in our own self-sufficiency.

But then the kids arrived. One – two – three in rapid succession. And suddenly I realize that I’m an outsider, standing alone just beyond the village gates. Desperately searching for my tribe, my people. The ones everyone says I should have. NEED to have. The ones who are going to help me through this.

They were right, of course. It does take a village. I see now how important the tribe is. To pick up a preschooler while I take a toddler to the ER. To watch a sick child while I run to pick up medicine. To delight in our kids’ visits, welcoming me with an ear and a shoulder when it’s all become too overwhelming.

It seems that everywhere moms are boasting about their tribes. Their close knit mommy groups that coordinate everything from carpools to casseroles. Built in play dates every day of the week. Field trips. And impromptu home gatherings where everyone toasts with wine and laughs about the trials of motherhood.

And I wonder – where is my village?

It’s becoming big business. Every week I see a new app or website that boasts higher success rates for matching you with the perfect mom friend. Like a dating app, except instead of romantic chemistry you’re searching for mommy chemistry. Someone who sides with you on all the mommy war topics. Who you can let your hair down with. Someone who will come over when you’re at your worst, help you pick yourself up, and take the kids out for ice cream.

Do I need to download a mommy friend dating app to find my tribe??

I complained about this to one of my non-mom friends. She is unapologetically child-free, living her best life and diving head first into excitement and travel as she sips her bubbly and flips her shiny, freshly washed and highlighted hair. I grumbled about being too old to find mom friends. About how the moms I meet locally are no less than one to two decades younger than me, with nothing in common.

“Eh, F it,” she shrugged, “Who needs ‘em anyway? This is yet another reason why I’m not having kids!”

She topped off my glass and we laughed. Then moved onto topics related to upcoming events and dream trips.

But still, the following Monday while she was at work and I was with the kids, I found myself anxiously searching for my tribe.

So I made dinner plans with an old friend. Someone who is my age, but whose children are nearly grown. A person I have shared more laughs and aspirations with than I can count. I knew that she would understand, and I wasn’t disappointed. She listened to me and nodded knowingly.

“I know, it’s so hard to find people you can trust,” she sighed.

We talked about our kids. College plans for hers, preschool plans for mine. Joked about her visit to my hospital room after baby number three, made complete by a bottle of margarita mix. Commiserated over the crazy-making that parenting can be. And she suggested that over time I would likely find local moms I vibe with.

So where are they?

I turned to my best male friend, a surfer carpe diem type guy who is forever inviting me out to Happy Hours and meals with the gang. I finally agreed to shower and attend a ramen outing (a daytime outing, but a meal out just the same). As I sat with my son in the company of men, I whined to the guy next to me about how I can’t find any mom friends to do this type of thing with. He reminded me that he is a father, a single father at that, and has been a longtime friend – but I told him it’s not the same. He reassured me that soon I would find some mom friends – I probably just needed to get out more.

So I did. I ventured beyond the local parks to a further park. And lo and behold – I met someone! Someone about my age, with two children, who I clicked with. We laughed and joked and agreed to exchange numbers… Then she let me know that she would contact me the next time she was in town. Turns out she is the aunt who lives across the country.

I shared the story of the new mom friend who almost was with a close friend that evening. An out-of-state friend of almost two decades who I talk to several times a week. I told her that my little one was sick, and if I could just find someone to come by and help for two hours, I could catch up on my work. She understood and said she wished she could still help. Before she left the state, she was that person. The one to come over and relieve me over a lunch break or in the early evening. The one who would join me and my clan, her two kids in tow, on outings to Costco and Target. And now she was gone.

How am I ever going to find new mom friends?

I texted my frustrations to a dear friend who lives about an hour away. A person I met at work many years ago. The friend who cared for my other children while each of their siblings were being born. Someone I trust completely. I told her I felt like I was Losing. My. Mind. without the quintessential mom friends that everyone speaks of. She texted back immediately, as she always does, comforting me and letting me know that she would come by that weekend. Asking if she should take a day off work during the week to help me. Reassuring me that we would figure it out. Together. That I wasn’t alone in this.

And suddenly it hit me.

THIS is my tribe. These people and the others in my life like them ARE my mom friends. Whether local or not, moms or not, and even female or not, these people make up my imperfectly perfect village.

They support me. They laugh with me and cry with me. They show up for our events, our celebrations. They bring us meals and wine and gifts for the kids. They send me cards. They miss the children, ask about the children, beg to babysit the children. They visit us and call us and text us – for no reason at all. Just because.

They may not be here every minute of the day. They may have other obligations. They may not even reside in the same state. But they are THERE. Available to me on a moment’s notice. Supporting me and checking on me and expressing their willingness, their desire even, to drop everything should we need it. Expressing their love. And we love them right back.

And this, I realize, is what makes a mom friend. Not the women perfectly manufactured from the mom friend mold, but – by definition – the people who surround a mom and who are her friends. That is a tribe. And I realize that while I’ve been peering in the gates of a village I thought I’d been locked out of, my tribe has been behind me the entire time.

Share:

Filed Under: Childcare, Parenting, Uncategorized Tagged With: find mom friends, find parent friends, friends with other moms, it takes a village to raise kids, mom friends, mom tribe, mom village, raising kids without a village, raising kids without family

Guest Post: Co-Parenting 50/50 – How One Family Makes it Work

by

Today’s guest post is from Dr. Yana Weinstein, assistant professor at the University of Massachusetts Lowell and co-founder of Learning Scientists.  She joins us to talk about her co-parenting arrangement.

My daughter is turning 4 in August, and for the majority of her life, her dad and I have not been together. I won’t go into why we broke up, but let’s just say it was not my decision and yet it worked out for the best for everyone.

Co-parenting is by no means easy even under the best of circumstances, but for now, we are making it work. I thought it might be worth describing how we make it work, in case others going down this road need hope and ideas.

Co-Parenting How One Family Makes it Work Part 1

Our co-parenting arrangement has had two distinct phases. I will be discussing the first phase today, and the second phase in a future post.

We officially split up when our daughter was 18 months old, and for the next year we handled it one way, and a year later, a different way; but in both cases, our daughter spend 50% of her time with each of us.

Phase 1: Business as usual?

Because our daughter was only 18 months old, we didn’t want our split to affect her routine, which was typically: dad gets her out of bed, does the morning routine, and takes her to daycare; mom picks her up from daycare and does dinner and bed. But, we didn’t want to keep living together – one of us had to move out, and either come over in the mornings (him), or in the evenings (me).

For various reasons, we decided it made more sense for me to move. I found a room in a shared apartment in the city, and every weekday my schedule looked like this:

Co ParentingGraphic created by Yana Weinstein using images from Pixabay.com

We also split the weekend, so we got one full day with her each; and I slept over at my former place/now my ex’s place one night per week (Friday or Saturday), so that he could go out.

How do you handle the logistics of 50/50 co-parenting? #coparenting Share on X

In case you’re considering a similar arrangement, following are the pros and cons of this routine:

Pros

  • Our daughter’s weekday routine didn’t change at all – she still woke up with her dad there, and went to sleep with her mom there.
  • Our daughter got to stay in the same house with all her familiar things, and in the same daycare.
  • We (the co-parents) both got equal amounts of time with her, both on weekdays (mornings or evenings), and on the weekends (1 day each).
  • I got to have evenings to myself – after 9pm I could go out with friends, and even date – more on that in the next post!

Cons

  • Because I lived in one town, worked in another, and took care of my daughter in a third, I did an immense amount of driving every day (see diagram).
  • Even though we were each with our daughter 50% of the time she was awake, as a Mother-(aka, Monster)-Who-Was-No-Longer-Living-With-Her-Child I felt constantly judged by everyone. This was probably mostly in my head, but still resulted in my feeling intensely guilty almost all the time.
  • I had to see my ex every single day, at 8:30pm when he came home (to what you used to be our home) and I left. Anyone who’s ever been through a breakup will be able to imagine why that’s not ideal.
  • My ex always had to be home by 8:30pm on weekdays, except the one day per week where I stayed over; in that respect, he had a lot less freedom than me.
  • Speaking of staying over, sleeping on the couch in the house I used to share with my ex and our daughter was fairly miserable.

Overall, the big pros for our daughter (keeping her schedule and spending equal amount of time with each of us) outweighed the inconveniences and discomfort we suffered as a result…up to a point. In the end, it was not sustainable.

In my next post, I will describe Phase 2, which we’ve been in for the past 18 months and plan to continue for the foreseeable future.

Dr Yana Weinstein (@doctorwhy on Twitter) is an assistant professor at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. She co-runs the Learning Scientists blog, which is a resource for teachers, students, and parents interested in the science of learning. Follow the Learning Scientists on Twitter at @AceThatTest.

Share:

Filed Under: Childcare, Parenting Tagged With: child custody, coparenting, coparenting with ex, divorce, how to share 50/50 custody, sharing custody with ex

My Biggest Mommy Question – Published on Mamapedia

by

My Biggest Mommy Question on Mamapedia

I’m excited that one of my popular blog posts, Can Mothers Really Have it All?, is being featured on Mamapedia today!

I wrote this post long before I ever took my leap, considering differing opinions on the topic via personalities like Sheryl Sandberg and Marissa Mayer on one end of the spectrum along with Katarina Alcorn and my own experiences on the other.  Even though I’ve now made a change, I still don’t feel that the question has been fully answered for me.

I doubt that it ever will.

Check out the post on Mamapedia and share your thoughts. Are you any closer to an answer than I am?

Can mothers REALLY have it all? #Motherhood #Parenting #SAHM #WOHM #WAHM Share on X
Share:

Filed Under: Childcare, Parenting Tagged With: american dream of having it all, balancing motherhood and career, can mothers have it all, can women have it all, career guilt, childcare, daycare, having it all, kids and career, mamapedia, mamapedia feature, mom career, mom job, mommy guilt, motherhood, parenthood, parenting, raising kids, sahm vs. wohm, stay at home mother, wahm, work life balance, working mother

5 Learnings From Employing a Nanny

by

5 Learnings (1)

Before I had my first son, I dutifully researched and ultimately selected a perfectly suitable daycare to place him in after I went back to work.  I liked the owner and the environment, and they passed all the checks on my list.  I completed the paperwork and paid the deposit.  All prepared.

But then my son was born – and my world was rocked.  I knew instantly that I couldn’t leave him in a daycare at such a young age.  I debated quitting my job and becoming a SAHM – and almost did – but then the worry of losing that income kept me looking for other options.  Fortunately around this time I was offered a much more flexible work-from-home position by my employer, and I realized that I could hire a nanny.  It would be a win-win.  I would be able to keep my job, yet be home with the baby and the nanny.  What could be better?

So I began my nanny search.  And hired a nanny.  And employed that nanny for over three years before she unexpectedly resigned.  And now that I am finally home with my children, I can reflect back on our learnings from that experience.

It is a job.

This is obvious.  Nannies are performing a job for income just like everyone else.  But the line is blurred when a trusted individual is taking care of your child on a daily basis.  You want that person to become “like part of the family” while still maintaining professional boundaries.  And this is extremely difficult to do.

The right nanny will be a special individual who truly loves children.  She will be patient and kind, hardworking and honest, structured and loyal.  You will entrust her with the most precious people in your life.  So when cracks begin to appear – let’s say the nanny begins having issues with excessive absences, for example – how do you handle it?  It is very different than a corporate job, where you would follow the formal steps of the disciplinary process.  This person is not a colleague – she is in your home taking care of your children.  So you talk to her gently, kindly.  Reinforce the importance of her showing up to work outside of an issue or emergency.  And trust that she will.

But if the issues continue, then what?  This is where it gets sticky.  How aggressive do you want to be with the beloved nanny helping to raise your children?  So you make excuses, turn a blind eye, talk to her again – but too gently.

I’ve since realized that this is a mistake, because by your lack of assertive action you’re essentially telling her “it’s okay.”  But it really isn’t.  Every time the nanny calls in last minute for a questionable reason, parents are stuck scrambling for backup.  And typically if the family has hired a nanny in the first place – there IS no backup.  Which means Mom or Dad has to call in to work and miss the deadline/forgo the big presentation/disappoint the team while meanwhile employing someone who is supposed to help prevent that.

So my learning here is to better outline the boundaries upfront.  Treat it as a job.  Define consequences.  And ultimately remember that you are the employer who sets the rules.  This doesn’t mean that you and your family can’t love the nanny, and treat her with the utmost respect for the significant work that she is doing, but that in the end you are paying her for services rendered – and it is appropriate that you expect those services to be rendered professionally.

Run the background, check references, and ask the hard questions.

It never ceases to amaze me how many people hire nannies without fully checking them out.  I literally know people who do not know their nanny’s last name, do not know where she lives, and wouldn’t be able to recall what kind of car she drives.  I get that many people are hiring on a reference from a friend or neighbor.  But shouldn’t you still want that information?  Call me paranoid, but this is the person helping to raise your children!  You better believe that I want to know every detail I can legally gather.

A common misconception I often hear is that the background checks offered on nanny and babysitter services like Care or SitterCity are adequate.  They’re not.  If you want a full and thorough background check (beyond what can simply be searched online), you have to hire an outside agency or investigator who specializes in these things.  Will it cost?  Yes – likely somewhere around $100-$150.  Well worth it, in my opinion, for peace of mind.

Also – check the references!  And this doesn’t mean simply calling the reference and asking a question like, “how was the nanny?” (I have received reference check calls myself literally asking only that question).  This means having a list of prepared questions ready to ask.  Specific behavioral open-ended questions.  Even the difficult questions.  Things like:

  • Tell me about a time when the nanny faced an emergency or urgent situation.  What did she do and how did she handle it?
  • How many times has the nanny called in since she has worked for you?  How often has she been late?
  • What are the nanny’s top three areas of opportunity?

I have found, throughout many many reference checks for both nannies and babysitters over the years, that the reference will typically give a glowing review.  Every time.  It is not until you really start probing with some of the more difficult questions that the reference may begin to share some of the opportunities as well.  And this is important – you want to understand both a nanny’s strengths and weaknesses going in.  I remember hiring a babysitter once who received rave reviews – yet the time I used her, she played on her phone the entire time while ignoring the children.

Which brings me to my next point: nanny cams.  I am a huge fan.  I do not hide them and I tell every candidate upfront that they are used.  They even know where they are, since they are in plain sight.  If the candidate is not comfortable with it, they are probably not the right caretaker for me.  I’m sorry but every time I step into a place of employment, there are security cameras tracking my every move.  If you’re watching my kids, I want to be able to watch you.

Finally, get to know the nanny.  Have her go through a formal interview process (phone interview followed by face-to-face interview, with prepared questions).  Have her complete a formal employment application.  Write up a contract of your expectations and your childrens’ routine, and have her review and sign it.  Save the documents.  Spend time with her before leaving her alone with your children.  Learn about her personality.  Understand the type of person she is from the beginning.

Paying on the books is a headache that helps me understand why most people don’t.

There will never be high rates of compliance in this area unless significant changes are made.  I am not exaggerating when I say that 98% of nanny employers I know pay under the table.  And I get it.

Because we always opt to do things the hard way (and because we try to “do the right thing”), we paid our nanny on the books.  And it was a nightmare.  Still is – many months later as I continue to receive tax bills.  I’m not recommending paying a nanny illegally, but let me save you the suspense on the learnings we had by doing right by the law:

  • Nanny pay is AFTER tax for the employer.  Yes, while every other small business is able to deduct wages off the top, families can’t deduct a dime.  You are paying your nanny after you have already been taxed – and then are taxed again for her.  This is a glaring issue that penalizes the smallest of small businesses – a working mother and father trying to raise a family.
  • The Childcare Credit won’t cover it.  Before you take comfort in the hopes that the Childcare Credit will help offset the costs, realize that the maximum credit is $600/year.  That is less than what most local nannies make in a week.
  • Fees for compliance increase over time.  Depending on state (we live in California), nanny fees/taxes increase every few years – I believe 3 years is the first significant increase according to my tax advisor.  Also, if you happen to be a nanny employer whose nanny collects unemployment at some point (let’s say while you are on maternity leave for a second child, or even after her employment with you has been terminated), a certain fee will increase up to an additional 9%.  So try to hire a nanny who will stay with for fewer than 3 years, and who will then never ever collect unemployment.  Good luck!
  • Overtime is required.  This is actually a good thing as it protects nannies from being taken advantage of by families forcing her to work excessively long weeks.  But it’s hard to compete at market rate with this requirement.  Let’s say the market rate is $15/hour cash (no overtime).  That’s $750/week for 50 hours.  For a family paying on the books, however, that translates to $825/week ($600 for 40 hours at $15/hour, plus an additional $225 for 10 overtime hours at $22.50/hour).  The best part?  Even with the overtime, the nanny may still take home less net pay.  Which brings me to my next point.
  • Nannies prefer under the table pay.  At least in this area.  When broaching the topic of paying on the books with candidates, I was faced with frowns, blank stares, and requests to gross up the salary so that the take-home rate would be comparable to the cash market rate.  Wonder how that request would go over with any other type of employer??
  • Nannies compare take-home pay rates.  While in most other industries it is extremely taboo to discuss compensation, nannies do it on a regular basis.  Within weeks of hire, my nanny knew and shared what every other nanny in the neighborhood was making.  Heck – I even hear directly when I’m at the park.  So parents paying on the books are at a disadvantage.  Unless you are grossing up, your nanny hears that she is being paid less.  In our case, we were actually paying above market – but her take-home pay was less.  We often highlighted the advantages for her of legal pay: social security, unemployment, overtime, etc.  But I got the distinct feeling that none of this was motivating nor attractive to her, and that she would have preferred the higher take-home rate (which would have been significantly cheaper for us as well).
  • The tax process is ridiculously difficult.  For the state of California alone, I received a pile of paperwork each quarter to complete and return.  And it was complex and time consuming.  I simply couldn’t do it, and was scared of making a silly mistake and then being fined thousands later on.  Therefore:
  • A nanny tax/payroll company must be hired.  Cha-Ching!  Okay, maybe not an absolute must, but close enough.  So now here is another expense: the cost of the tax company, a cost for payroll, a cost for direct deposit into the nanny’s account, a cost for each filing, etc, etc.  While I love the company that we used and would highly recommend them for their expertise and ability to streamline the process (HomePay), it is not an insignificant chunk of change.
  • Workers Compensation insurance is required.  Depending on state, you are required to carry this insurance when hiring a household employee.  This is good to have anyway, and not something I dispute, but it is an added expense that people paying under the table are not required to incur.

And before someone tells me that a nanny is an independent contractor who I can 1099, let me tell you that she is not.  Nannies have been clearly defined as W2 employees and must be treated and paid as such.  There is really no out.

So while I still recommend paying on the books to do things the legal and “right” way, I definitely can’t say I blame anyone who doesn’t.

Accommodate, but don’t overly accommodate.

This is that sticky area again.  You want to accommodate the nanny while still maintaining clear boundaries.  And again I am reminded how hard this is to do.

By accommodation, I mean working with the nanny on various things.  For example, I accommodated our nanny in that I gave her input on the hours she earned each week.  I only needed her until the boys went down for a nap in the late afternoon, but I gave her the option each day to either go home or stay and do chores around the house to obtain more hours.  She opted to go home after the boys were put down, and I was fine with that.  I think this was fair on both ends.

An example of when I feel we over accommodated was when she let me know that she was going to start looking for other jobs, shortly before my second son was born.  She wanted more hours.  Fair enough.

But she didn’t want the weekend hours we could provide, didn’t want to work before 7am, and didn’t want to work beyond 3:30pm (already, we had begun accommodating her schedule preferences almost exclusively).  She indicated that she would leave once she found a suitable position, or that she would leave earlier if we found a replacement sooner.  And so I thanked her for letting me know so that we could begin preparing – and we began the search for a new nanny.

We ended up finding someone we really liked, and I let our current nanny know that we were planning to make an offer.  But she had not yet found anything, and apparently the search hadn’t yielded the results she had expected.  She was upset, and expressed that she had changed her mind and wanted to stay.  And truthfully, I wanted her to stay too.  It would be easier.  My son knew and loved her, she knew the routine, no big shake-up.  And so I agreed, relieved.

My husband disagreed.  He felt that if she had wanted to leave at any point, we should be letting her go.  He really liked the new nanny and felt she would be a great fit for our family.  He worried that we were already over accommodating our current nanny in terms of her hours and some other issues.  But I convinced him to let her stay.  A very key part of this was the nanny’s commitment that she would stay with us until our eldest son started kindergarten about three years out.  We did not ask this of her, but she expressed it and then re-committed on multiple occasions (her long term plan at that point was to take some time off to be with her own child).  I thanked her and expressed my gratitude for her commitment.

Second baby came along and we gave her a raise.  Gave her periodic bonuses.  We continued to accommodate (albeit more reluctantly now) several unexpected absences.  But were secure in the knowledge that she had committed to stay with us another three or so years.

Fast forward 17 months, and the nanny quit anyway.  Over text message, no less.  Said she decided she no longer wants to work and wants to spend time with her child instead.  And this time we didn’t have anyone else lined up.

We never mentioned the broken commitment, and neither did she.  What would it matter at this point?  But I knew – we had over accommodated to our own detriment.  We should have gone with the other nanny when we had the opportunity.  Should have set the expectation that we as the employer choose the working hours (within reason).  So learned the valuable lesson around accommodation – when to do it, and when to say when.

Budget beyond just an hourly rate.

Until we employed our own nanny, I assumed that a nanny is paid an hourly rate and that’s that.  But it’s really not.  As I mention in my first point, it is a real job and should be treated that way.  That means the nanny should receive paid holidays, Paid Time Off (PTO), an annual bonus, and a host of any other perks that may help to retain and motivate her.  I often see new moms posting on mommy forums, asking what benefits they should be offering to their nannies.  Following is what I have seen in our neighborhood as standard:

  • Paid holidays.  All the majors, along with any extras that you may have off.  This seems to only apply if the holiday falls on a regularly scheduled workday.  If Christmas Day falls on a Saturday, for example, I haven’t typically seen parents pay for that day.
  • Paid vacation.  Two weeks a year is standard around here, with the stipulation that the nanny takes one week of her choosing, and one week of the family’s choosing (e.g. if the family goes on a vacation).  We decided to do things a little bit differently.  She still received two weeks, but it was in the form of PTO, meaning that she could use it whenever for whatever she wanted.  She did not have to use it when we took a family vacation, but she often opted to use at least a few days while we were gone.
  • Paid sick time.  This seems to be all over the board.  Most families I know have nannies who have rarely, if ever, called in sick.  If they do, the family may pay the nanny or opt not to – I’ve seen about a 50/50 split.  Our nanny seemed to call in quite a bit, so this was taken out of her PTO.  Once she exhausted all her PTO, remaining sick days for the year were unpaid.
  • Annual bonus.  These are typically given at the end of the year, and the average I’ve seen in this area is one week’s pay.  Other families opt to instead purchase a nice gift or gift card for the nanny.  Some families give a bit more – we gave close to two weeks pay plus a gift from the family (for example, one year we got her a crockpot she had mentioned wanting and another year we gave her personalized picture frames with photos of she and the kids).  Don’t skip the bonus.  It is expected and is a way to thank your nanny for all her hard work throughout the year.  Including a heartfelt card expressing your appreciation for all her work goes a long way as well.
  • Periodic bonuses.  I’m not sure that I’ve seen a norm on this, but we would give periodic small bonuses (less than $100) throughout the year as we noticed the nanny making an extra effort or just doing a really good job.
  • Gifts for life events.  A nanny is close to the family, and her life events should be celebrated.  Birthdays, anniversaries, and other holidays.  When our nanny moved, we gave her a needed gift card for furnishings.  When an extended family member passed, we sent flowers and gave her paid time off.  Acknowledging these events and celebrating or recognizing them with the nanny helps to show her how much you care about her not only as a nanny, but as a person.
  • Health benefits.  We did not provide this.  We simply couldn’t afford it!  But I do know of a couple of families who do (the norm around here, however, seems to be not to offer any health benefits).  I know that this is much appreciated by the nanny and can definitely help with retention and her motivation to work.
  • Job benefits.  Most local families require their nannies to be CPR certified and First Aid trained.  They expect the nanny to pay for and schedule these classes herself.  That is fair, but in our case we covered the cost of CPR certification, First Aid training, and annual re-certification for our nanny.  This helps her not only with us, but with her future career prospects as well.
  • Other perks.  Here is where you can get creative!  I’ve seen some families pay for a gym membership or a bus pass.  Others pick up the nanny’s favorite snacks.  We offered meals and gifts from various travels.  At times we would allow her to bring her son with her – this is a big perk for nannies with young children.  Anything to show that you value the nanny can go under this category.

Make sure you account for all of this in your annual nanny budget.  It is much easier to save a bit of money each month for a year-end bonus than to come up with a large amount all at once.  Don’t skimp on the benefits.  If you would rather skip the holidays or vacation or bonus, then perhaps a nanny is not the right childcare option.  These are standard benefits that a nanny will expect and will come to resent if she does not receive.

This has been my experience with employing one nanny, and interviewing and testing out several others.  I absolutely recommend hiring a nanny as a great childcare option if budget permits and if the right person can be found.  It allows the child to be home, in their neighborhood, following their regular routine, and allows the parents more oversight as to what the child does every day.

Where it gets difficult is with the employer/employee relationship.  The lines can easily blur, so it is important to set clear boundaries from the start – and stick to them!  This helps set expectations for both the nanny and the family, opening up the lines of communication.

If I’m in need again, I will definitely hire another nanny.  Although this time I will be better equipped with knowing what to expect and how to handle different situations.  I will know better what qualities to look for, and what may signal a red flag.  And I will never compromise on background and reference checking.  And ultimately – have trust and hope for the best.

Share:

Filed Under: Childcare, Parenting Tagged With: babysitter, babysitter background check, breedlove.com, care.com, childcare, childcare credit, daycare, employing nanny, hire babysitter, hiring nanny, homepay.com, increasing fees for nanny pay compliance, lessons learned from employing nanny, lessons learned from hiring nanny, nannies want to be paid under the table, nanny, nanny accommodations, nanny background check, nanny behavioral questions, nanny benefits, nanny bonus, nanny budget, nanny cams, nanny employment application, nanny health benefits, nanny hiring, nanny holidays, nanny interview, nanny interview questions, nanny job, nanny overtime, nanny pay after tax, nanny pay rates, nanny pay tax process, nanny payroll company, nanny perks, nanny phone interview, nanny pto, nanny quit, nanny references, nanny sick time, nanny tax company, nanny vacation, nanny workers compensation insurance, paying nanny legally, paying nanny on the books, paying nanny under the table, should i hire a nanny, sitter, sittercity.com, thoughts on hiring nanny, treat nanny as a job

7 Reasons the United States Needs Paid Maternity Leave

by

7_Reasons_The_US_Needs_Paid_Maternity_Leave

Did you know that the United States is one of only three countries that does not mandate paid time off for new working parents?  Let that sink in.  One of only three countries internationally.  The other two are Papua New Guinea and Suriname.

To be crystal clear, this is not one of three industrialized countries.  Or one of three Western countries.  Or one of three countries with any other criteria.  This is one of three countries in the entire world.  Meaning that even developing nations have better maternity leave programs than we do.  Countries like Rwanda, Iraq, Haiti, and Bangladesh.  Even the United Nations offers paid maternity and paternity leave.

The United States is the ONLY industrialized nation in the world without paid parental leave.

Take a look at this infographic for just a quick idea:

Paid Maternity Leave in the United States

Shocking, isn’t it?  Here in the States, pregnancy is considered a “disability.”  Postpartum mothers are paid a whopping grand total of either 6 weeks (for a vaginal delivery) or 8 weeks (for a c-section) out of Short Term Disability funds collected through employee payroll deductions.  Many, if not most, working mothers are then forced to return to their jobs as paid benefits have been exhausted.  At 6 weeks or 8 weeks postpartum.

As my Canadian cousin says, it is barbaric that American women are forced to return to work so soon – at a point when they likely haven’t even completely physically healed from the trauma of childbirth.

Did you know the US is the ONLY industrialized country with NO paid #parental #leave? Share on X

Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)

Yes, the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993 was a small step forward in that it began providing a total of 12 weeks job protection (6 or 8 of which could overlap with Short Term Disability pay).  However, there is no additional compensation associated with the act and it also has firm restrictions that exclude approximately 40% of the American workforce (for example, it cannot be leveraged by employees of small companies or by those who have not hit a minimum threshold of hours of service with one company).  Perhaps because of this, it hasn’t significantly increased leave times.

A few states – California, Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island – have enacted their own laws to provide some additional compensation and protection, and fortunately for me I live in one of them.

California Family Rights Act (CFRA) and Paid Family Leave (PFL)

California, as an example, has enacted the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) which allows a working mother or father 12 weeks of unpaid job protection to care for a family member.  While FMLA and CFRA run concurrently, the difference is that FMLA begins at the time of delivery, while CFRA bonding leave doesn’t begin until the mother is released from Short Term Disability – essentially extending job protection an additional 6 or 8 weeks.

California also offers Paid Family Leave (PFL), funded by employee California State Disability Insurance (SDI) contributions, which provides working mothers and fathers up to 55% of capped weekly earnings for up to 6 weeks.

Clear as mud?

What this all means is that, in California, a working mother is entitled to up to 18 to 20 weeks of  total job protection (depending on type of delivery) under FMLA and CFRA.  The first 6-8 weeks are fully paid by Short Term Disability, and then the next 6 weeks are paid at up to 55% of the capped earnings amount.  Any additional job-protected time is unpaid.  Much better than most states, but still not enough.

Other (Most) States

So then how does it work in other states that have not enacted additional legislation?  The working mother is eligible for a total job protected period of 12 weeks after delivery under FMLA.  She is paid for the first 6-8 weeks out of Short Term Disability.  After that, she remains unpaid until returning to work.

And the working father?  He is entitled to 12 weeks of FMLA job protection.  Not a day of it is paid.

So do I think that paid parental leave is something that should be offered to every working American mother and father?  You bet I do.  And here are the reasons why.

Increased consumer spending and larger tax base.

Paid maternity leave results in increased consumer spending.  Mothers on paid leave are more likely to spend, and the ultimate retention of those mothers in the workforce generates a larger tax base.  The Institute for Women’s Policy Research concludes that a paid leave program could increase national GDP by as much as 5% simply by boosting female labor force participation.  Yet research by Cornell has found that the American female labor force participation rate is decreasing – from 6th place internationally in 1990 to 17th place in 2010.

Paid maternity leave policies can help change that.  Since Google implemented their new generous maternity leave policy, the rate at which mothers leave the company has been reduced by 50%.  Public response to new similar programs offered by Facebook, Netflix, and Microsoft has also been overwhelmingly positive.  The retention of women in the workforce is good for mothers, companies, and the economy.

Breast is best.

This is undisputed, and has become a major talking point (almost to a fault) amongst American mothers, doctors, and even politicians.  Nobody denies the fact that a mother breastfeeding her child is providing the best nutrition and immunity available.  Yet we force mothers back to work when they may not even have fully established a milk supply yet – I know that even my own paltry milk supply definitely took more than 6 weeks to establish.

Fun fact: on an international trip sans baby a couple of years ago, the airport TSA staff were fascinated with my breast pump – they had never seen one.  So were my international family members, who had also never seen one.  Why would they have?  Mothers in other countries are largely able to remain home with their children until they have weaned.

Pumping at work is not easy, and is often looked down upon.  Even with legislation providing certain protections to pumping mothers, it is still difficult to find appropriate areas to pump and managers who are fully supportive.  More than once I found myself pumping in a storage closet or with the tacit disapproval of my managers when having to step out of an important meeting.  No wonder most working mothers give up only a few months in.

Business financial burden concerns are exaggerated.

A popular argument against paid maternity leave programs is the potential cost to employers – not only to help fund the programs, but to account for the financial strain resulting from mothers or fathers on leave.  Yet this simply doesn’t play out.  Using the states with enhanced leave programs as case studies, the Center for Economic and Policy Research found that up to 99% of California employers indicated that the new leave law had a positive or no noticeable effect on productivity, turnover, employee morale, and profitability/performance.  Even more compelling are the nearly 10% of California employers who actually cited a cost savings due to reduced employee turnover and reduced benefits costs.

These findings are not unique.  A University of Virginia study concluded that mothers who took California paid family leave were more likely to be working a year later than those who did not.  And a Rutgers study found a 40% decrease in incidence of receiving food stamps or public aid for New Jersey mothers who took paid leave.

Keep in mind that program costs don’t necessarily have to be shouldered by employers either.  In Canada, for example, funding comes from the federal Employment Insurance program paid into by working Canadians.

Improved gender equality.

This may sound counter intuitive, as this is typically an argument used against paid family leave.  But hear me out.  Today, paid Short Term Disability is only offered to American mothers for the abysmal period of 6-8 weeks.  With the exception of the five states that have implemented more attractive policies, fathers are unable to receive any pay upon taking a leave for the birth of a child.

So what does this mean?  You guessed it: fewer fathers take any extended time off to bond with their new children.  Subsequently increasing their hiring desirability when matched up against equally qualified women of childbearing age.

But imagine that both mothers AND fathers, as equal caretakers, were offered comparable leave programs – or essentially one leave program that either the mother, father, or both could leverage.  No longer would only women be dinged by potential employers for the possibility that she would eventually take family leave – the risk would become the same for either parent, man or woman.  Mens’ advantage over women at the time of hire would decrease as either gender could be expected to take a family bonding leave at some point.

Increased workplace retention.

Retaining talented employees is a win for both the organization and the employee.  Without mandated paid family leave, many mothers are forced to choose between returning to work at 6 or 8 weeks postpartum, or quitting their jobs completely to stay home with their children during the critical first year.  This was a decision I greatly struggled with for each child – even with the advantage of being able to extend my job-protected (but not fully paid) leave to 18 weeks by residing in the state of California.

Contrary to opposing arguments, the National Bureau of Economic Research suggests that mothers offered paid leave of up to one year are more likely to stay in their jobs as a result of not having to quit to obtain adequate time off.  It makes sense.  I think most mothers would feel much more ready to return to work at a point when their infants are older, more mature, and not so dependent on them.

For employers, a longer leave period makes sense as well.  It is much easier to hire a temporary employee or to cross-train an existing employee to take over the work of the mother on leave for a period of 6-12 months than to simply rely on other employees to cover, in addition to their regular jobs, for 6-8 weeks.  This also allows employers the opportunity to challenge and train other high performing employees, exposing them to rotational work in new areas and allowing for stronger succession planning.

Procreation is necessary for our society’s survival.

We’ve all heard the argument.  The one that says if you’re choosing to be a mother, then any financial or other ramifications are your sole responsibility.  But I beg to differ.

What if nobody decided to have children?  Because we couldn’t afford it, or it was looked down upon, or for any other reason?  Dramatic example, I know, but our society would cease to exist within one to two generations.

The point is – children are not simply an “option” chosen by selfish parents.  They are necessary for our very survival; at a minimum, to take over the reigns for us as we age and to continue our country’s existence.  Parents or not, we all benefit from the next generation.

Therefore, we all have a responsibility to ensure that our children are given the best start.  Paid parental leave provides parents the opportunity to bond with and raise their children during an extremely critical and formative period of their young lives.  It facilitates strong attachment and helps to set the foundation for the rest of their lives.  I doubt anyone could argue that an often overstretched childcare provider can possibly provide better care during the first year than the child’s own parent.  And that parent should be free to administer this care without the financial burden to the entire family that our current lack of paid paternal leave imposes.

We are one of only three countries in the entire world that doesn’t mandate paid maternity leave.  We are the ONLY industrialized nation without it.

How can this be so when we tout ourselves as a nation that promotes family values?  If the children are truly the future, why are working parents often forced to leave them with other family members (best case scenario) or practical strangers (worst case scenario) to act as primary caregivers 40-60 hours a week?  How can it be that developing, impoverished, and war-torn nations have better leave policies than we do?  Can we truly call ourselves the leaders of the free world if we can’t even supply the basics for our families?

The silver lining of all this is that the tides slowly appear to be changing.  I’ve heard more discussion on this topic from both fellow American citizens and politicians in the last couple of years than ever before.  Private companies are now taking matters into their own hands with the implementation of significantly improved parental leave programs, and others are taking notice.  Competition for talent will continue to result in increased benefits even as the government lags behind in federal policy.

Yet it is still not enough and we shouldn’t accept that it is.  Certainly the United States of America can pull itself out of the bottom international position for paid family leave.  I am hopeful and optimistic, and hope that you are too.  Mothers, fathers, and all citizens deserve it.  Children depend on it.

And they are, after all, our future.

Share:

Filed Under: Childcare Tagged With: breastfeeding and maternity leave, California Family Rights Act, CFRA, cost to business of maternity leave, countries without maternity leave, countries without paid maternity leave, countries without paid paternity leave, countries without paternal leave, countries without paternity leave, discrimination for pumping mothers, family leave, Family Medical Leave Act, financial burden of maternity leave, FMLA, FMLA restrictions, FMLA usage, gender equality with maternity leave, google maternity leave policy, hiring discrimination for mothers, increased retention with maternity leave, increased spending with maternity leave, job protection after baby, job protection in california after baby, larger tax base with maternity leave, maternity leave, Paid Family Leave, paid postpartum leaves, paternal leave, paternity leave, PFL, PFL amounts, PFL caps, postpartum, postpartum leave periods, Pregnancy Disability, research on maternity leave, Short Term Disability, states with enhanced maternity leave, studies on maternity leave

Subscribe

Hi, I’m Faye!

Mommy. Former Corporate American. New Freelancer/Risk-Taker. Foodie. Traveler. Spiritualist. Simple Living Learner.

Featured On

Follow Me on Facebook!

Popular Posts

  • My 2017 Year in Review: A Year of Change
  • 7 Vehicle Purchasing Hacks
  • 10 Ways Toxic Bosses Drive Their Best Employees Away
  • 15 Things to Consider When Reviewing a Job Offer - Besides Salary
  • Parenting is NOT a Death Sentence for Fun (Guest Post)
  • 7 Reasons to NOT Have a Baby in the United States
  • 12 Ways the Transition From Two to Three Kids Rocked Me
  • 7 MORE Learnings Since Quitting My Job One Year Ago
  • 10 More Things I've Learned About Breastfeeding - At 6 Months Postpartum
  • Thank You to the Woman in the SUV

Archives

Copyright © 2026 · Lifestyle Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in